Historical Horrors and their Erasure in South Tahoma

[KV]

1 minute ago, Lemonade319 said:

The contention is mostly with the outright ignoring that the act even takes place. I have no issue with Kyle wanting to RP this way, if his character is creepy that's fine, he didn't outright RP the act hence why it wasn't report as, in our mind as a collective who've mostly RP'd together on various platforms for 7 or so years what he did wasn't really wrong.

He should however have his actions called out ICly, which is what we did. Our main issue is the fact the outright banning of his characters actions (that he chose) being acknowledged in an in character sphere.

So basically, you took what he RPd, ran a rape narrative and explicitly broke the rules for your own means.  Weird.

[ImEmma]

No. Feels like this was put up because a member of a faction you are in got banned because he broke the rules.

We do not need rape or accusations of rape or anything to do with the subject on this server and I cannot see this ever changing thank god.

You don't need these things to do native rp or any sort of rp it's disgusting and disturbing.

[destroya22]

 

[Tinfy]

Quote

While we must never depict or condone these acts in-game, it is crucial to acknowledge that such events were part of the historical landscape of the time. Ignoring these injustices and refusing to talk about them, even in the context of play, is exactly what abusers want.

I have to double dip here. I am just, stunned, by the audacity you have to think you and whatever vapid artless roleplay you're slinging are the white-knight-saviour of Indigenous and other minority women on the hit text-roleplay RedM server South Tahoma Roleplay. Just stop.

[ewthn]

Just now, SebastianGR said:

When someone gets a verbal for something they instigate OOCLY in public and someone who roleplays and makes an IC assumption / Accusation between 4 people in private gets 14 day ban is unjust in my personal opinion.

It was an IC assumption/accusation levelled toward another player on this server, accusing them of being a rapist. It's not cute, it's not a loophole, you're just not welcome to level that sort of accusation. The only conversation that should is exist is that the punishment for sexual deviancy in the community should be harsher, not temp bans like in other recent cases.

 

3 minutes ago, Lemonade319 said:

He should however have his actions called out ICly, which is what we did.

No - again, he should be reported and removed from the community if he was doing this. Have the admins looked into what the player was roleplaying? I fucking hope so.

[badteaspoon]

10 minutes ago, kyle_ said:

Not only your slander which has reached several people, making individuals come into my DM's to accuse me of this behaviour, but also the fact you have continued in spite of the staff's hardline disapproval.

This is why these rules are in place. Funs over tahomies, go back to your cowboy barbies.

[Lawliet]

I'm having flashbacks. Thank you for not being a community owner or stakeholder. In all seriousness, the rule's been in place since before launch. It's a pretty obvious one. Why pick this hill to die on? 

[Bailey]

After reading through the initial post, and then the immediate & overwhelming court of public opinion’s response, Management have come to the following decision:

No.